Garland Code Compliance Continue Cover Up Efforts for Wrongdoing, Misconduct and Dishonesty With Court Case

I have 7 code compliance citations that I am fighting and am currently waiting for my case to be heard with a trial by jury. It is scheduled for December 4th, 2017 but, the City of Garland is known for delaying trial dates as long as they can. The court sets a trial date and when that day arrives, the judge calls the defendants up to the bench and explains that they are overbooked that day and there is no way they will be able to get to their case that day. The court resets the trial for another day.
The new date arrives and the judge repeats the process. Garland courts are known for doing this to people. The court repeats this delay tactic until your case can't be delayed further due to it being on the top of the courts docket that day.
People think, "Finally! I get my day in court!"

Did Garland Code Compliance Officer and Inspector Execute A Phony Search Warrant?

Two signs made by homeowner and placed in yard surrounded by 8 foot
privacy fence. Code Compliance inspector saw signs and  executed
a phony search warrant.

What is the difference between a "phony search warrant" and an "illegal search warrant?"

An illegal search warrant is a document that was obtained in a legal manner and obtained from a judge. However, some aspect of it is determined to have not met the legal requirements needed to support itself in court when challenged. That is probably a crude definition. Here is an example:
A code enforcement officer who is the designated official from their department, submits a sworn affidavit to support a search warrant to the local judge or magistrate. The purpose of the affidavit is to give the judge probable cause and if the judge agrees, they sign the warrant and it can then be executed. If the warrant is challenged on the probable cause not being sufficient and holds up in court after the warrant was executed, then the warrant is deemed to be an illegal warrant.